How to read a fund honestly
Taught on real Indian funds and real numbers, each lesson linked to the page where it can be checked. Five to eight minutes each. No account needed.
Start with lesson 1 No quizzes, no scores, no streaks.
The lessons
in order
-
What does a Regular plan actually cost?
Up nextRead the cost of a distributor out of two NAVs of the same portfolio, and see what it comes to in rupees.
The argument against it: A Regular plan buys advice, and advice that stops someone selling in a crash can be worth more than the fee. The cost is visible; the saving is not.
-
Can a fund beat its category most of the time and still be behind?
Up nextTell a hit rate from a payoff, and know which one a headline is quoting.
The argument against it: Rolling windows overlap, so a hundred of them are not a hundred facts; and the comparison is only as good as the category it is drawn against.
-
Does any of this predict which fund wins?
Up nextUnderstand why a past-performance table is not evidence, using Anveshan’s own failed study as the worked example.
The argument against it: A negative result is a statement about one sample and one decade. It does not prove nothing can ever be found; it proves this study did not find it.
-
What does a monthly portfolio leave out?
Up nextKnow the age of the newest portfolio anyone can see, and what the gap between a NAV and its book means.
The argument against it: A gap between a NAV and its last disclosed book is usually a trade nobody has published yet, not a problem — and the replication here has its own error.
-
Whose record is the three-year number?
Up nextCheck a displayed return against the tenure of the people who are actually running the fund now.
The argument against it: Fund houses have processes and research desks that outlast individuals, so a change of manager is not a reset — and a factsheet names the manager of record, not necessarily the person deciding.
-
What does the SIF label not say — cost, risk, or what to compare against?
Up nextRead three Specialised Investment Funds with one official label side by side, and see the label leave out the fee, the risk and the right yardstick.
The argument against it: A year of NAVs with one fall in it is a small sample: funds that look far apart now may converge, and the differences may say more about launch dates than about the strategies.
-
What can a personal statement say that a fund page cannot?
Up nextSee why the gap between a fund’s return and its holders’ returns is usually about when they bought, not what they bought.
The argument against it: An X-ray of a finished decade describes decisions already taken. It cannot tell anyone what to do next, and nothing in it is advice.
Each month
new portfolios, new figures
The month in the data
Portfolios through Aug 2026 are in. The Sep 2026 portfolios land around the tenth of the following month. Why monthlyFunds disclose their holdings once a month. When a new month lands, every measure here moves with it: a new three-year stretch closes, a new tracking gap opens, a fund changes hands.
Read a fund alongside the lessons
Every fund page asks the same seven questions, each with its number and the argument against it. The seven questionsIs the headline return luck or record, what does it cost, whose track record is it, and four more. The lessons explain how to read them; the fund pages are where to practise.
What each postulate found
Every question tested, with its result so far, including the ones that found nothing.
The monthly masterclass
a perspective, never a recommendation